This is a busy blog post! First is my review, then an interview with the author. At the end, you'll find out how to win a copy of The Last Plea Bargain.
Summary: In Jamie Brock's three years as an attorney, she has never plea-bargained a case and is determined never to compromise her standards. However, when a well-known defense attorney is charged with killing his wife, he advises his fellow prisoners to refuse plea bargains and therefore backing up the court system until prisoners begin to walk as the justice system becomes overwhelmed with cases. Desperate to bring a conviction to the man who defended her mother's killer, Jamie just might have to make a deal with the devil.
My thoughts: Many advise writers to write what they know, and it's evident that Randy Singer knows about law and the justice system because the several story lines are woven together tightly, creating an exciting ride to the surprising finish.
In addition to telling a fast-paced court-room thriller, The Last Plea Bargain brings up the moral and political issue of the death penalty as Jamie's mother's killer makes a last ditch effort to delay his execution. The death penalty is a controversial topic, and Singer handles is gracefully, allowing the reader to come to his or her own conclusion.
Fans of suspense will enjoy this legal thriller that not only entertains but also gives the reader some food for thought.
I was given this book in exchange for my review. My thoughts are my own.
7 Questions with Randy Singer
Randy Singer, The Last Plea Bargain
- Randy, you bring
a unique perspective to your writing because you are also an attorney and
a pastor. How do you juggle these three things and still have a life?
Who said I had a life?
But seriously, it helps that these
three things all draw on common skill sets. For example, principles of powerful
story-telling are important for a pastor, lawyer and (obviously) writer. I’m a
little ADHD and like being able to go from one thing to another. It’s like crop
rotation—keeps things fresh. And, to be honest, writing is more like relaxation
for me than a job. It gives me a break from the pressures of the other “real
life” jobs and lets me go into a world where I get to control things! (aka “God
complex”)
On the practical side, there are
three principles that help me juggle. One, I try to stay focused on the big
stuff. It’s not that I do the little stuff second, I try not to do the little
stuff at all. Second, I stay focused on what I can do well and let
others worry about the stuff that is out of my control. And third, I’ve learned
to get comfortable with the fact that I will always have stuff in each of these
areas that does not get done. As long as the ball is moving forward, I’m
satisfied with that.
Ultimately, I thank God that, in
His grace, He allows me to do three separate things that I love. My prayer is
that I might bring glory to Him in all three arenas.
2.
The Last Plea Bargain is loosely based on
a case you tried. Can you briefly share with us some of the details of that
case and why it is special to you?
In 2002,
Donna Somerville was indicted for the murder of her husband, Hamilton
Somerville, Jr., in Orange County, Virginia. Hamilton Somerville was heir to
the DuPont fortune. The prosecution alleged that Donna Somerville had poisoned
her husband with a lethal cocktail of hospice drugs and the case drew national
media attention, including a front-page story in Vanity Fair and a Lifetime
movie, Widow on the Hill. Donna
Somerville was found not guilty in the criminal case in 2004, but I represented
the daughters of Hamilton Somerville in a wrongful death civil case against
their step-mother which had a very different outcome. That litigation, and the
tension between seeking justice and extending forgiveness, played a large role
in the writing of The Last Plea Bargain.
3.
Your
main character, Jamie Brock, originally appeared in your novel, False Witness. Why did you decide to
bring her back, and will we see more of Jamie in the future?
Readers will often ask me whether
I’m going to bring back one character or another. I make a mental list of the
characters mentioned the most often, realizing that those characters must have
resonated with the readers in some way. Jamie is mentioned a lot. In addition,
in False Witness, we saw her as an
idealistic and persistent law student. Given her intriguing backstory and
motivation for going to law school (her mother was killed in a home invasion
and Jamie wanted to become a prosecutor), I thought it would be fun to follow
her as she matured into a tenacious but conflicted prosecutor.
4.
Jamie
takes a pretty hard stance against plea bargaining. How rampant is plea
bargaining in the legal system and is it necessary?
Most people don’t realize that about
90% of the criminal cases in our country are disposed of by plea bargains. A
plea bargain is when the defendant pleads guilty to a crime, frequently in
exchange for a lighter penalty.
This book asks the question: What if
the defendants in a certain jurisdiction banded together and decided not to
plea bargain, insisting on a full jury trial for every case? It would overwhelm
the system. There wouldn’t be enough prosecutors or public defenders or
available court dates. Even the defendants who lost would be able to claim
ineffective assistance of counsel or the lack of a speedy trial on appeal. The
system would be thrown into chaos.
That’s what happens in The Last Plea Bargain. Jamie Brock is
staring down defendants who have found a way to wreak havoc with the system.
Who is willing to compromise? Who will blink first?
5.
While
plea bargaining is part of the overall plot, at the heart of the book are the
issues of justice and mercy. How does Jamie learn to balance those two?
Justice without mercy is legalism.
Mercy without justice is license. Only when we realize the need for justice
tempered with mercy do we have a fair and equitable result.
It takes courage to pursue justice.
You have to stare evil in the face and demand accountability. It is easier to
let evil have its day. So, if we cling only to mercy, then there is nothing to
stop the advance of true evil. We live in a constant state of spiritual
warfare. And God is a God of justice. We should be irate at injustice in the
world and willing to risk our own lives to stop it.
But passionately seeking justice is
just one step away from vengeance. And Scripture tells us not to take revenge
into our own hands. Romans 12:19. Instead, we should leave room for God’s
wrath, not trying to overcome evil with evil but overcoming evil with good.
Romans 12:20-21.
How do we draw this line? I believe
a lot of it has to do with motivation. Are we mad because somebody hurt us or disrespected us? Chances are, that’s vengeance. On the other hand, are we
striving for justice for others, or
devoting ourselves to a just cause? Chances are, that’s seeking justice.
6.
What
do you hope readers walk away with after reading this book?
First, I want readers to be
entertained. If the story isn’t compelling, nothing else matters. So my primary
goal is that readers will find it impossible to put the book down and, when
they turn the last page, shoot me an email asking how long it will be until I
finish another.
Second, I want to present readers,
in the context of story, with compelling characters on both sides of the death
penalty debate, so that readers might draw their own conclusions. And third, I
want readers to walk with my characters down that thin line that separates the
lust for revenge from the hunger for justice. And…hopefully, to learn which
side of the line they might be walking on.
- Okay, Randy, what’s
next?
I’m working on my next book
tentatively entitled Rule of Law. It
will come out next spring. It’s the story of another flawed protagonist. He is
a former college quarterback who got caught up in a point-shaving scandal,
served time in prison, and then went to law school and became a lawyer. He
finally gets his first job but ends up at a firm where somebody is killing off
all the firm’s lawyers, one-by-one (even lawyers who try to leave the firm).
It’s a story about loyalty and trust, honor and betrayal.
At the same time, I’m working on a
longer-term project (one that’s been on my desk for a long time) which will
give readers a front-row seat to the two most important trials ever—the trial
of Christ and the trial of Paul in front of Nero. The story is told from the
perspective of Theophilus, Paul’s court-appointed advocate, and may be the most
important book I’ve ever attempted.
Finally, the publisher has generously offered a giveaway with this review. The prize is a certificate valid for one copy of The Last Plea Bargain
AND a signed book plate from Randy. The certificate can be redeemed at
the winner’s local Christian bookstore (US only) or through Tyndale (if
there is no local store).
To enter to win, leave a comment about something in the review or interview that peaked your curisosity. For me, it's the long-term project Randy is working on. I'd love to read about the trial of Christ from an expert opinion like Singer's.
To get a second entry, follow this blog and leave a second comment letting me know you follow.
I'll choose a winner next Sunday, the 15th.
This giveaway is open to the US only.